Comments on: Ten Reasons Why “220 Minus Age” Is Just Plain Wrong http://cyclingfusion.com/fanatics/heart-zones/ten-reasons-220-age-plain-wrong/ Cycling indoors and out, and loving them both. Mon, 24 May 2010 18:39:13 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Jack Briant http://cyclingfusion.com/fanatics/heart-zones/ten-reasons-220-age-plain-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-20 Jack Briant Fri, 02 Apr 2010 21:07:14 +0000 http://cyclingfusion.com/fanatics/?p=521#comment-20 Dear Sally I have never read anything more revealing about the CVT than I just read. I never thought that 220 minus your age was accurate just as one size does not fit all. A cottage industry was built on this very concept. And it surprises me with all the advances in exercise physiology today that we continue to use something that was invented as a yardstick not as a religion as it is being used everywhere. Dear Sally
I have never read anything more revealing about the CVT than I just read. I never thought that 220 minus your age was accurate just as one size does not fit all. A cottage industry was built on this very concept. And it surprises me with all the advances in exercise physiology today that we continue to use something that was invented as a yardstick not as a religion as it is being used everywhere.

]]>